Il secolo breve by Eric J. Hobsbawm, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. : Il secolo breve () by Eric J. Hobsbawm and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books available. Il secolo breve. ( L’epoca piu’ violenta della storia dell’umanita’). by Hobsbawm Eric J. and a great selection of related books, art and collectibles.
|Published (Last):||23 January 2004|
|PDF File Size:||17.43 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.17 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Review native language verification applications submitted by your peers.
Secollo ask other readers questions about The Age of Extremesplease sign up. Individual desire became the measuring rod of what was ‘good’.
Il secolo breve : Eric J. Hobsbawm :
Will not historians extend the hobsbawj Twentieth Century just a little bit longerto ? The paperback has almost pages of densely packed ideas, and I often found myself re-reading paragraphs. It is probably too long and too biased for use with undergraduates, although sections could be carefully culled and added to reading packages. The great [Chinese] famine ofprobably the greatest famine of the twentieth century: The final chapter I found really hit a chord that resonated loudly. Patents, Trademarks, Copyright Law: Close and don’t show again Close.
Hobsbawm has no solution for the reader other than some vague sense of badly-needed “reform”. His discussion about growing inequality, climatic effects, globalisation and the challenges of population growth could have come out of yesterday’s newspaper the book was published in First, no solution to the economic malaise was found apart from government intervention and regulation of the economy – in other words the market, left alone, did not ‘fix’ itself.
I was hoping for a book to give me a good overview hobsbam the bits of the 20th century I need to teach my yr11 course.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. At the time he finishes his study inthe world looked quite bleak even though the collapse of the Soviet Union saw a ‘victory’ for free market economies and the stagnation of state planned ones.
Eric Hobsbawm writes in a manner that is not too academic or dry, but this hovsbawm is packed full of interesting researched facts and analyses, and the chapters on the arts, stemming from the early 20thC avant-garde right through to ‘modern-art’ however we interpret it today were really insightful.
Jun 29, Travelin added it Shelves: Hobsbawm has very mixed feelings about the end of the nineteenth-century imperial order, largely because he is no happier with the hobsbam that replaced the empires. Some parts are rather disgusting. According to Hobsbawn in it’s importance the transformation is comparable to the invention of writing, cities and agriculture.
A glaring omission as Perry Anderson noticed is the disappearance of the bourgeoisie from Hobsbawm’s masterpiece. Both art forms are tied into the eras they were developed in, more or less being mirrors of the society that they inhabited.
Their only hope of salvation was reform and modulation of classical liberalism itself. This page was last edited on 13 Augustat Although the narrator seldom intrudes directly into the story, Hobsbawm’s version of the “short century” revolves to a large extent around the great Cynically echoing Francis Fukuyama’s “End of History” thesis of the same period, but giving it a more pessimistic bent, Hobsbawm avers that: You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs or are passionate about them.
Il secolo breve 1914-1991
He effectively describes “the weaknesses of the self-serving party bureaucracy of the Brezhnev era; a combination of sevolo and corruption” and is stinging about Maoism. School textbooks simply follow a timeline, a guarantee not only of boredom but that the reader will learn next to nothing.
For anyone interested in understanding the modern world and their place in it, a sound grasp of modern history is indispensable.
But how is this to be done? The reader also needs to understand this is not a ‘history’ in any ordinary sense of the word. Hobsbawm’s apologetic tone towards the USSR is inversely related to his barely-concealed repugnance toward the USA and dim assessment of its global footprint, an interpretation that appears to be based mostly on traditional British anti-American snobbery, European chauvinism and subaltern claptrap rather than on even-handed judgment.
Final Words The greatest irony of The Age of Extremes is its year of publication and periodization As Hobsbawm puts it, “Capitalism had proved far easier to overthrow where it was weak or barely existed than in its heartlands. Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy. The period was a canyon which henceforth made a return to not merely impossible, but unthinkable” Other books in the series.
In hobsvawm of his few more concrete predictions, he writes that “Social distribution and not growth would dominate the politics of the new millennium. It seems as if Hobsbawm was too confused or dishonest about the goals and accomplishments of communism to give it to us straight in chapter 2.
This paved the way for what Hobsbawm calls the “Golden Era”, the third quarter of the twentieth century in which not hobsbwam the developed world, but the developing world experienced profound economic growth. Post Your ideas for ProZ. Hobsbawm certainly popularised the notion of the short twentieth century -a periodisation which is now widely used. But in addition, Hobsbawm gathers these threads and weaves them into a coherent narrative with a verve and acerbic wit that blow the dust off those source tomes and bring them to life, in colour.
How well did capitalism do over this period?